On Apr 19, 4:46*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
For the EPA's justification for greenhouse gas regulation under
the Clean Air Act please see:

http://epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html

The above page has good references. *For an example:

http://epa.gov/climatechange/endange...dangerment.pdf

Figure 4.2 and its discussion above is a good reference on the
acceleration in the temperature rise.

There is no such entity as a Greenhouse gas it is a construct
to explain how CO2 warms the Earth.
Warming of the Earth will cause CO2 to increase because the
Oceans will lose CO2 as they warm.
There is no logical physical reason why CO2 causes warming.
Arrhenius was wrong.
Please explain how, lack of water vapour causes the poles to
to warm more quickly (Arrhenius) and increasing water vapour
causes runaway GW (IPCC)
Logically you cannot have it both ways.
However logic is not your strong point.
Producing a row of 9s to support the claimed
accuracy of a statistical method or saying that
estimates include both measurements and conclusions
demonstrate that.