On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:12:32 GMT, "Ms. 2"
wrote:

"T. Keating" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:40:15 GMT, "Edmund Fitzgerald"
wrote:

"29-Apr2009"
The Sun is blanK:
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/...spots_1024.jpg

No it's not blank, you're just not using the appropriate spectra and
contrast to see them..

http://www.spaceweather.com/images20... l96rhqnhgfe97

It's an Extreme UV snapshot from SOHO on 04/29/2009..


http://www.spaceweather.com/ as of 12:00am EST April 29, 2009

NEW: Spotless Days
Current Stretch: 0 days

It is blank. You are not looking at the appropriate date/time. The current

You're not looking with the proper display & graphics card! It's also
on your Michelson Doppler Imager gray scale photograph, (near the
sun's equator on the far right). But, one must look very carefully at
that photo (in the same location) with an 8 bits per color
professional LCD or CRT monitor.

Typical el-cheapo LCD displays are based on fast acting 6 bits per
color/pixel TN technology.

http://www.pchardwarehelp.com/guides...anel-types.php

disappearing "sunspot" is cycle 23! You false optimists are a dime a dozen.
You false optimists always fail to see the big picture - "Charities suffer
from global financial crisis". Take your false optimism and shove it.

It's still a emerging sunspot (larger than the day before,4/28/2009.)

http://www.spaceweather.com/images20... l96rhqnhgfe97

Just because it doesn't have magnetic polarity to match Cycle 24
doesn't disqualify it as a newly formed sun spot..