"Bill Carter" wrote in message
...
Androcles wrote:
"Bill Carter" wrote in message
...
Marvin the Martian wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:41:14 +0200, qqq_qqq wrote:

The same thing in multiple posts, with the only difference being who
gets the gratuitous insult.
This coming from someone who never posts anything with content
worth reading. A few insults and - run awaay!

Which one of those cites you've given points to the proof of global
warming being man made? Even the IPCC doesn't claim to have that.
What, specifically, would constitute proof?

A constant, evenly distributed temperature for 20 years, followed by an
increase in CO2 and an evenly distributed rising temperate. Polar water
at -32 F and Mexican Gulf water at 80 F is not an even distribution, nor
is it constant, but it would, specifically, constitute proof.
Any more questions?

Yeah. How, specifically, would that prove anthropogenic global warming?

Since there is no anthropogenic global warming it wouldn't be possible,
but if there were, then
a constant, evenly distributed temperature for 20 years, followed by an
increase in CO2 and an evenly distributed rising temperate. Polar water
at -32 F and Mexican Gulf water at 80 F is not an even distribution, nor
is it constant, but it would, specifically, constitute proof.
Any more questions?