"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On May 8, 11:26 am, "James" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...
The consensus is that James failed to learn
anything about climate models from blog entries
like this one below. It so wrong, it's not
even an opener for debate. Should you, unlike
James and his fossil fool phonies, really
want to learn something about climate models,
actually running one is the best place to start.
Please go to:

http://edgcm.columbia.edu/
--------------------------------------------------------
Give us all a break Roger. If I wanted to learn all about modeling,
I'd
do it. I want to know the results of THEIR modeling which I posted

The article you posted does not even correctly
report model results.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, did they misspell something? Even using their cherry picked input
data, they can't correctly achieve anything except make it available to
people like you who make dire predictions from it that don't ever
materialize.


You
seem to think if someone once changed a flat tire, they automatically
become a master mechanic.

No, but someone who's changed a tire, knows
how to change a tire.

How many models have you been intimate with?

I've never had sex with a model. ;-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm glad you admit models are not your forte'. Maybe you should change
another flat tire. You never know.