On May 14, 2:37*pm, "BobLl" wrote:
marcodbeast wrote:
BobLl wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
....
11th Warmest April on NASA's 130-year Data Set
We supposedly have a crisis of accelerating warming yet April 2009
has fallen out of the top ten in warmth. *I'm amazed you think this
tidbit supports your case.
We are accelerating, read my post.
In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.
Please see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...20080923c.html
I guess you haven't noticed that the fossil fuel industry has gone
quiet on opposing AGW - for good reason. *They've realized that these
crazy cap and trade schemes will artificially raise prices - very
good for the oil companies. * They're busy planning how to capitalize
on AGW.
Why do you post a link to a 2008 story citing 2007 data. *The cooling
since 2002 is obvious in this data but we've had another 16 months of
cooling since then.
*Why do denialists pretend they don't know about temporary cycles
when it suits them, and blame everything on them the rest of the
time? *lol
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2008-231
I'm consistent. *I've always believed that natural changes and ocillations
are responsible - both for the warming in the 80s and 90s and the cooling in
the 00s. * From your own link:
"During most of the 1980s and 1990s, the Pacific was locked in the
oscillation's warm phase, during which these warm and cool regions are
reversed."
The entire AGW crisis phenomenon is built on the warming seen during the 80s
and 90s. *Now you apparently agree that this was just a climate
oscillation - not due to CO2. * You must then also agree that AGW is just a
big mistake.
Hay Bob! Do you know how to read a graph?
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/hadSlope1850-2008.jpg
The trends you spoke of, the 1980's and 1990's,
they are only in your imagination. Anyone speaking
of global climate trends shorter than three decades
is a fool who needs an introductory course in
statistics.