On Jun 11, 9:17*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 11, 9:49*am, Dawlish wrote:



All you have done is make statements which you somehow feel are causal
links.

Or rather, in your case, links missing.

no evidence - no use.

And unfortunately for us, you won't realise your best course if that
is the case, will you.

Still, never mind, eh? Mustn't grumble. At least you live out
Exitdoorway. Things could be worse. Half a nice day.

Then produce some outcome evidence W and stop evading the issue.

As I said - and it is completely pertinent, however much you'd like it
to go away; "no evidence - no use". After monitoring of 8 predictions,
an outcome percentage success of 14.2% doesn't look good. I'm awaiting
the "strong" earthquakes around the Isthmus of Panama in this quarter
"spell". You've still got a couple of days left and I imagine your
fingers are now crossed as I'll add this to the monitoring. That kind
of success rate makes all the causal links you've referred to, in the
first post on here, more than questionable. Really it would make
anyone think that they simply don't exist except for you.

The abuse can't be far away.