On Jun 12, 11:32*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:22:48 -0700 (PDT), Weatherlawyer

wrote:
On Jun 12, 8:35=A0pm, wrote:

Keep it coming, Mr McNeil.....!!

snip lots of erudite stuff



But there you go.

Or not as the case may be.

You are a tease! I thought you might say that!

Best wishes

Geoff

You have a fan W!

However, again, you've produced a whole load of retrospective stuff
and your "explanations" are just links that you see - they aren't
really there. It's your lack of capability to predict that brings into
question everything about your theory. You can write long posts until
the cows come home justifying your predictions, but the words just
don't add up. Again, you've made a prediction about "strong"
earthquakes around the Isthmus of Panama, mentioning nothing about
Vanuatu in your analysis of this quarter "spell". Look back to the
first post. You can't suddenly begin to justify earthquakes in the
Vanuatu area, simply because they have happened and therefore there
must have been a cause related to your theories. You guessed the wrong
place for the earthquakes.

You think your theories are correct, but the actual outcomes, in terms
of predictions show clearly that they aren't. It's only when someone
looks into these outcomes that your scribblings are revealed as what
they really are.

No prediction accuracy: no use.