On 23 June, 01:13, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 22, 9:48 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 22, 6:40 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Jun 22, 4:07 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com..._liddle/articl...

You know, I'd have thought that you'd have generally agreed with what
Mr. Liddle was saying. I don't see, from your point of view, that you
would have found his views at all controversial.

Are you stalking to me?

Just wondering why you find Liddle's comments controversial?

But my dear Mr. Garvey. You keep telling me and all who will listen that
my
opinions are worthless.

But Mr. Jenkins, you didn't express an opinion, you posted a link and
said it was controversial. I don't see how you could find what was
written controversial, after all you have said?

You are asking me Mr Garvey why I found Rod Lidde's comments controversial.
Now to do that I would have to give my reasons; in other words my opinion
which I you claim to be worthless at any time.

Anyhow as you rightfully say, I didn't find Rod Liddle's comments
controversial at all. I assumed others would though.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Crikey, I could almost have written that article myself. Rather
echoes what I said in another thread, and for which my opinion was
castigated and regarded as "bizarre" and "stupid"...

CK