"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jun 28, 5:14 pm, "Green Turtle" wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
[ . . . ]

Yes, the data are corrected
for the urban heat island effect.

How...please cite how the data was corrected? Link here please. Without
knowing how this data is corrected for urban heat effect, your data is
worthless

REPEATING MY ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION FOR THE SECOND TIME, Mr. TURTLE.

Start he
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1987/...n_Lebedeff.pdf


the above document does NOT explain how the numbers are being corrected. The
above document ONLY explains how they make an average out of the
temperatures NOT how they are modifying the number for UHE, that is GRAND
CANYON of difference.

So, no tomato on that link...that only explains the methods use to average
the temperature and how some bad values are ignored. The document DOES NOT
explain how temperatures are changed and corrected for UHE.

So, once again, please provide a link with how the numbers are changed for
UHE, the link you gave does NOT show how the data is modified for urban heat
effect. Taking averages is NOT modifying data for UHE...not even close!!


Super Turtle.