View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 27th 09, 04:15 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.politics.republicans
Baron_Mind Baron_Mind is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
Default Critical error in frightie-rightie, anti-global warming propaganda/agenda..

IM@too_gay was still regurgitating right-wing political pabulum:

Baron_Mind was amused by the knee-jerk reactions exhibited by:

IM@too_gay writhed in denials when it was pointed out by:

Baron_Mind pointed out and ridiculed the false claims uttered by:

"Kent Deatheredge" was sniveling again because:

Ouroboros Rex was laughing at the contemptible ignorance exhibited by:

"Kent Deatheredge" was writhing in denials:

-------
This is a symptom of weenieism to make such unsupported statements.

I have an idea. When I need science word salad from a
schizophrenic liar with zero knowledge of the subject,
I'll let you know. lol

(unbroken string of lies snipped

Normal expostulation of your true weenie spirit.

Kent, you are an ignorant right-wing moron, such that your
ambitious ignorance will continue to run aground of actual
scientific facts, no matter how you try to deny it..

Example follows..

Although theoretical science has chosen in recent years to
refuse the term, 'proof', or 'burden of proof'

*LOL!* As if you possessed the critical reasoning skills
to be able to say so, authoritatively, you shambling imbecile..

--See subject header for details, you craven cretinous coward..

Only a leftist creep would think right wing has anything to do


Only a "foaming true believer" and right-wing zealot would
resort to such false 'black_or_white" dichotomies..

--Nice sockpuppet, let see you dance around the subject some more..


There is no right wing, there is only the leftist control freaks


That would be incorrect, as it's you insecure right-wingers that
are the 'control freaks', as well being sexually repressed and
usually sexually deviant..

Note that I didn't disagree with you


Yes, you did, and this isn't the Argument Clinic..

I only remarked about your suggestion that political leaning
has anything to do with people discussing physical processes.


I doubt the veracity of your claim, owing to a paucity of
discussion, usually by right-wing foaming true believers,
of the actual physical facts in an objective manner..

--Got physics? I'm fluent..