"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Aug 5, 5:52 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message

...
On Aug 5, 5:39 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Dawlish" wrote in message

...

The first set of data has been produced from RSS. By far the highest
satellite reading for some time.

http://climate-graphs.co.uk/

Well if confirmed it's obviously not a jump in runaway AGW is it? Co2
hasn't
suddenly trebled , the suns output hasn't increased , the opposite in
fact.
Nope the only smokin' gun is the oceans and a massive belch of heat
which
means the energy is ijn the atamosphere and will be lost far quicker
then
it
would have been. So we will now see a decline with of course that
further
increase in global sea ice.

It's a fact. Just like GW is over the last 40 years.

Be sensible man: we've had a flat lining of temps the last ten years and
there is no obvious reason for a *monthly* surge bar a massive belch of
energy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There isn't a monthly surge.....yet. It's the first of 5 measures of
global temperature that are produced each month and to which I
generally refer the newsgroup to each month. No-one knows what the
other 4 will show.....yet. However, we do know that June had the
second highest temps of a 130 year sequence (NOAA) and all 6 months of
2009 have been in the top 10 warmest in that sequence, despite an
extended solar minimum. Explain how that can possibly be if the GW
trend is not continuing. And try these questions.

Q1. Are the global temperatures higher than they were 40 years ago?

Q2. Have you any idea what you are talking about?

Answers on a postcard, please to;

The Pie in the Sky,
Room 101,
"I'm sure about this, despite the contrary evidence" Towers,
Hope Against Hope St.,
Luckyville,
Cloud Cuckoo Land,
Bonkersworld.

Oh so you've moved again, why are you telling me?