Today's model interpretation (20/08/09)
"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
John Hall writes:
In article ,
Roger Smith writes:
I hope, Darren, that this morning's posting as a "reply" to your posting
of
20th August is an aberration.
It wasn't, but there was a typo in the subject line, with "(20/08/09)"
instead of "(28/08/09)". If it appeared as though it was a reply to the
original 20/08/09 post, then your newsreader must thread on subject line
rather than on the References header.
When I said "It wasn't" I meant that it wasn't a reply, in case I wasn't
clear.
--
John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
"Well, actually, they're American."
"So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"
John
I realised it wasn't a reply as such, but I did not notice the typo in the
header. The newsreader therefore automatically placed the message under the
earlier message having the same subject line.
Best regards, Roger
|