"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 5:01 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:


You can prattle on all day about Joe's accuracy UKMO isn't that good, in
fact I've always stated that UKMO always over egg the pudding with their
ludicrous severe weather warnings which manage a staggering degree of
hyperbolic inaccuracy only hours ahead.

You can choose to ignore the accuracy stats, or you can believe what
Joe *******i says. I guess that's the ultimate in style, over
substance.

The fact that you mix short-term severe weather warning accuracy with
seasonal forecast accuracy shows you don't understand weather
forecasting accuracy measures. You may state something, but you never
have the stats behind you to back what you say - so how could anyone
believe you?

You seem to know only one way in how to respond to a person its called tha
napalm everything approach. All that ******** about me "not understanding
weather" and you do you pompous fool. Your responnse is always to say how
great thou art and how stupid everyone else is. However when push comes to
shove you couldn't even get the Arctic ice prediction correct and as usual
with your sawn off shot gun approach you repraoch everyone for doing what
you do in spades -avoid the issues.

You never responded to one point that I made about Joe B and UKMO.

By the way giving out two hourly severe weather warnings when they don't
happen, is forecasting you fool. Of course you know about weather which led
you to state that a strong cool breeze would be protect a person from
sunburn-idiot.


I'm being a bit strong here as your bludgeoning comments are starting to
sicken me. You seem to be of the school where if you repeat something enough
its the truth. You sir are a nutter.