[OT] Use of foul language in this ng
Mike Tullett wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:13:52 +0100, Murray McGregor wrote in
In message , Martin Rowley
writes
It should not be
necessary to make a scientific point without swearing.
Whilst I agree with your sentiments entirely, your last line made me
grin a little.
Agreed as well. I had to read that three times before I cottoned on to
what you meant:-)
Well being pedantic, Martin as used a double negative, which obviously
makes a positive. IMHO I think a better sentence would have been: 'A
scientific point can be made without swearing'.
I hope no offence taken Martin.
Joe
|