On Nov 4, 7:33*am, Natsman wrote:
On 4 Nov, 01:32, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Nick" wrote in message

....
On Nov 3, 11:21 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...nge/6496196/Al....

How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.

Oh how easily the sheep are led.

I see your source is the Telegraph, that well known paragon of
balanced, unbiased views ;-)

Nick

Well Nick is it true or not, or are you acceptable of millionaire as opposed
to billionaire. Seems to me either way Al has made himself a fortune whislt
saving the planet. The oil companies make a fortune which they tend to
inevst the bulk off in supplying us with heat. light and internet

The source is of no import, the Gore man is a proven charlatan. *And
the Telegraph probably has more balanced views, than say, the
Guardian, which adopts a strangulation policy on commentators who
don't subscribe to the AGW religion.

CK- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It is the chosen newspaper of the right wing and it's audience would
include people who would like to think the majority are wrong about
climate change. Thus it writes for them. To express its views as
"balanced" would be a strange tenet at best! It's a newspaper. It has
views and an editorial policy. It sides with minority science on
climate change issues. So what?