"Falcon" wrote in message ...

wrote:

On Oct 28, 11:34 am, "Falcon" wrote:
Ouroboros Rex wrote:
Falcon wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:

On Oct 28, 12:53 am, Last Post wrote:
[ . . . ]
If it comes from NASA those numbers are
meaningless since September is the beginning
of spring in the Southern hemisphere.

September was beginning of Spring in the Southern Hemisphere for
every one of the last 130 years. NASA data say this September was
the warmest in all those 130 years.

Global SST anomalies fell slighty between August and September, the
majority of the decline in the Northern Hemisphere.

September 2009 Southern Hemisphere SST Anomalies:
Monthly Change = -0.019 deg C
http://i34.tinypic.com/5ocuw4.png

The Optimally Interpolated Sea Surface Temperature Data (OISST) are
available through the NOAA National Operational Model Archive &
Distribution System (NOMADS).
http://nomad3.ncep.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/pdisp_sst.sh?lite

Thanks, that's sea surface temperature.

IPCC AR4 has something to say about SSTs.

.. IPCC AR4 has been thoroughly debunked.

I hate the word debunked: it smacks of the kind of ridiculous blanket assertion that typifies the average AGW alarmist article
and, ironically, most of the Hansoneque scientific research papers that the media love these days.

"debunked" : "To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims".
Sounds like the correct word to use for falsified papers with exaggerated claims.


However, it's true that IPCC 2007 and its aftermath has led to an erroneous tendency to focus on the reduction of CO2 emissions as
sure-fire method of 'controlling' climate change; a belief that has little or no reliable scientific basis.

Really ? And may I inquire as to how you drew that conclusion ?
The IPCC used thousands of peer-reviewed papers to obtain their assessment on all aspects of human-induced climate change.
How many peer-reviewed papers can you come up that are substantially divergent from their assessment ?

It's fun watching some scientists come up with ever more convoluted ways of explaining the real world's increasing divergence from
IPCC CO2-heavy climate models.

Where did you see this ?
Any reference ?