On 5 Dec, 04:21, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
wrote:
On Dec 3, 8:03*am, "E.D.G." wrote:

"Hatunen" wrote in message

... to which the True Geology clear & *forward answer is Planetary
drift leading in turn to Planetary Expansion !

Of course, I admit, such evidence is unacceptable by a sci000ntific
brainwashed community whose alleged knowledge is hooked on Sectarian
Superstition !

... As all present Universities Gogology beliefs indicates indeed
( all theories without exception are incoherent) ... is it a proof of
devolution or say intellectual degeneracy all the way down from the
submits attained by Classical Greek Philosophy ?
I suppose it is !

By the way, *Mr EDG is quite correct in his findings,
He is right in that the warning signals are clear but wrong when he
says they don't indicate a pattern supplying where and when.

I don't know if you have heard this example of weather-lore but:
"One man's meat is another man's poison."
OOPS!
"One man's good weather is another man's bad."

That is true wherever you live. The exception of course is extreme
weather.
Usually when it is raining on someone the sun is shining on someone
else. That is a law of nature, clouds are only so big and tend to grow
under the conditions required of/for their area, which conditions are
required elsewhere for sunny weather.

And the weather when it is extreme in one area will almost always be
extreme in the other manner, in that other place or places. We
recently had a severe spell of bad weather. In Britain "bad weather"
concerns rain. And the opposite conditions to severe bad weather here
tends to be bush fires in Australia and SantaAna winds in California.

I haven't heard of any places stricken with drought but then I have
been out of the loop for a while, still am.
Of course the saying can also apply that severe wet weather in Cumbria
is accompanied by severe wet weather in the Asian Pacific or if I
guess correctly, VietNam.
But I AM just guessing.

You can generally tell when a severe storm has hit the latitudes lower
than the regions where they used to dump horses from the NEIC or Red
Puma lists. The USGS allows you to browse their archives on-line, the
USA despite all I have said about its third world class politics, is a
stupendous scientific resource.

So far.

The Red Puma and NEIC lists are lists of earthquakes.
When a severe storm has hit the coast of for example the Philippines
or Japan, Korea or VietNam there will be a resounding quake (actually
a series -but the archives won't show that#) there will be a
resounding series of quakes some 80 degrees from the harbours where a
storm crashes home.

Don't ask me why. All I know about storms is that they build up
severity out at sea and dispense it all at once once they reach shore.
Then the components fall apart and go their own separate ways.
I have the idea it is something to do with tides. And since tides are
just sonic shocks applied to the land coming out the ground, they
would tend to build up in a spot under the ocean deeps where the sea
floor reflects them to one focus. (Just guessing.)

(If you look up the quakes that occurred following the severe one at
Banda Atjeh at the end of 2004, you'd get the impression nothing much
happened anywhere until a couple of weeks later. Actually quite a lot
happened and almost all of it in Sumatra. Almost nowhere else had
earthquakes for that time period well into January.)

Tides have this connection so that opposite shores on a channel no
matter how close, have a slightly different behaviour pattern. if the
channel is wide enough, by the time the acoustics have gone down to
the sea floor and climbed up the other side, the harmony and timbre
even the notes have changed.

It's either that or the amphidromic points* on one side of the channel
go the long way around so that the tides move from southern Spain up
through France into the Low Countries and Germany, up Denmark and
through the ex USSR sea coasts to Finland, Sweden, Norway, Russia,
China, Indo-China, India, Pakistan Arabia and all those African
nations either up the Rift through Egypt and Lybia or down past South
Africa and up the other side, detouring along both sides of absolutely
EVER river and stream along the way to Morocco.

I plump for the straight line every time but both might be true too.
(In fact, both have to be true too. But that is another story.)
*An "ampidromic point" is a place on the sea where the tide is the
same "state" of "high or low tide". You get one every six or so hours
in most places. You can find charts of them on-line looking like
contours (which is almost what they are.)

Its the tidal constants that give enclosed arms of seas the gyres
which can develop (if the tides are so different either side of their
channel or neck.) Don't take my word for it. Nobody is daft enough to
do that. It's what gives me my free speech. If I had to prove all the
things I say I'd have no more to say on any subject than the likes
Skywise and his ilk have about important subjects such as earthquakes.

(Not that I begrudge his bent farthings, dodgy though their provenance
be.) One man's meat is after all another man's crust crumbs. I'd brush
them off my beard but to some they may seem precious.

Thomas Gold got a lot of the theory about quakes correct but left out
the signal that does the dirty. But how could he know what that was,
he wasn't reading my stuff and I wasn't reading his.