On Dec 13, 4:42*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:32*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Ned" wrote in message

...

"Dawlish" wrote in message
....
........and you've failed yet again (24 times being asked is quite
unbelievable Lawrence) to explain what you feel Antarctic sea ice has
to do with your left field ideas about GW!
Bit like you claiming to know all about baroclinic leaf cyclogenesis yet
making a ricket of it as you also did claiming the midday summer sun
didn't cause sunburn. *You either go so quiet when you make mistakes, or
abuse other posters.

--
Ned

I should say he reminds me of a funeral hearse driver I once knew who had no
sense of direction -he kept losing the plot.

Back to the plot Lawrence; don't try to draw succour from this stalker
who *only* posts on here to try to have a go at me. He has no use.

The plot and the thread is about Global Sea ice; would you mind giving
your views on the link between Antarctic Sea ice and GW?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No it isn't, it's about you, and the reason is as follows:-
Lawrence made a perfectly reasonable reply to your initial posting and
got a sarcastic response. Why? He then put up a good-humoured
response to your rudeness, above and beyond the call of duty. He
quickly came to the conclusion that this was more than you deserved
and put up something rather amusing. But the initial rudeness in this
thread was on your part. You have ruined your own thread; pooed on
your own doorstep. Take responsibility for your own actions, you
great baby. Your are nothing more than a latter-day Violet Elizabeth
Bott.
Look, I'll save you the trouble:- Safely ignored.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.