View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old December 30th 09, 05:02 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
crunch crunch is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 29, 4:38*pm, (Ian Davis)
wrote:
In article ,
Sir David wrote:

On Dec 29, 11:54 am, Carl ducked a simple
question:
On Dec 29, 10:38 am, Tom McDonald wrote:
What do you use to study and predict your local weather?
Why do you ask? I did not know you were green.


Carl refuses to answer a simple question (keeping his perfect record),
and follows it with a non-sequitur. He's just a meaty urologist at the
firm of Duck, Dodge, and Hyde. Who can't answer a simple questions,
but sure can kookdance!


I think the question was asked of Kelly. *If so David is just shoving an
oar in gratuitously, Ian.


Yet, if you re-read the thread, you will discover that
you are quite mistaken here. I believe you yourself
are gratuitous in this context. Please correct yourself
for the future.

As ever,
Dave