View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old December 30th 09, 05:38 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
crunch crunch is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 30, 12:17*pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
On Dec 30, 9:02*am, crunch wrote:

On Dec 29, 4:38*pm, (Ian Davis)
wrote:
I think the question was asked of Kelly. *If so David is just shoving an
oar in gratuitously, Ian.

Yet, if you re-read the thread, you will discover that
you are quite mistaken here. *I believe you yourself
are gratuitous in this context. *Please correct yourself
for the future.


Yeah...it' really stinks that he actually thought Tom was responding
to me, rather than you. *But, in true NPD fashion, you just had to
point out that at that moment Tom's attention was really on you,
rather than me (your arch nemesis ;-)


Liar!

You missed that Tom McDonald said "Thank-you"
in response to my answer to his question of me.

So, in order to clear your own twisted head, you
should contact Tom in order to convince yourself
that your sighting of NPD is quite mistaken.

And, you owe me a massive apology for your massive
outpouring of bunk Thiering Thesis and whether
or not David Christainsen is a professional meteorologist.

What a waste of time you are, Lazy!

-----

David Christainsen - Meteorologist