View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 30th 09, 05:46 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,soc.religion.quaker
( ( is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Default The global warming debate has gotten to an absurd level

On Dec 30, 9:38*am, crunch wrote:
On Dec 30, 12:17*pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:

Yeah...it' really stinks that he actually thought Tom was responding
to me, rather than you. *But, in true NPD fashion, you just had to
point out that at that moment Tom's attention was really on you,
rather than me (your arch nemesis ;-)



Liar!


Which part do you think I'm lying about, Soggy?

You missed that Tom McDonald said "Thank-you"
in response to my answer to his question of me.


How would you know what I've missed and what I haven't. Are you
here? Are you in my head? Do you see with my eyes?

The answer to all of these is "no", ergo, it's impossible for you to
know one way or the other what I "missed" and what I didn't.

So, in order to clear your own twisted head, you
should contact Tom in order to convince yourself
that your sighting of NPD is quite mistaken.


Nope. I don't have to "contact Tom" about anything. He was talking
to you intially but was happy to discuss the whole thing with me in
light of your non-answer. As far as your NPD goes...I think pretty
much everyone here now realizes that it's the case with you.

And, you owe me a massive apology for your massive
outpouring of bunk Thiering Thesis and *whether
or not David Christainsen is a professional meteorologist.


No I don't. Thiering is a crackpot and you are not (and never have
been) a professional meteorologist.

What a waste of time you are, Lazy!


And yet, you keep reading and responding to my posts...go figure.