On 12/30/09 5:43 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
Sam wrote:

On 12/30/09 4:47 PM, Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
Sam wrote:

On 12/30/09 10:45 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:40 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

Until a few dacades ago, Peter. The CO2 ain'y been this high for
15,000,000 years!

Actually, he just debunked that. More fraud on the part of the AGW
advocates.


Marvin, you should invest in some glasses. As of March 2009,
carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is at a concentration
of 387 ppm by volume and increasing at a rate of 1.7 ppm per
year.

Caused by what?
Evidence your claim. Here.

Btw, show me the data set for your 15 mio. years claim.
Where is it?
And don't come up with Google now.
I want to see YOUR data set you are referring to.

As I told Marvin... the concentration and rate of increase
in concentration of CO2 is an observable, and undeniable
observable.

I'm not talking about the last 130 years here.
Have YOU observed the als 15 mio. yaears? How?


As for the cause, there is more and more evidence suggesting
that human activity (deforestation, cement production, fossil
fuel burning) is a contributing factor.

There is NONE, and you know this.
Repeatedly parroting this AGW ******** doesn't make it more credible.


Peter, why don't you take global climate change seriously?

Oh, I take it as it is, a natural variation.
Nothing serious and nothing dooming.
This you should do also.


Sit down, get data sets and do some research on your own, instead of posting
bite-sized more or less false graphs and science.

What's false about the data and graphs I've linked in
posting, Peter? You better have a better answer than
repeatedly saying they are lies, etc.