In message
, Tom
Bennett writes
On 7 Jan, 21:20, "Stan" wrote:
Looked to me every time he was asked a question and started to answer he
just got shouted over.

Looked at it earlier this evening and didn't like it one bit.
Bullying for the sake of it and cheap jibes from a presenter who's
parrotting potted "facts" whilst clearly only out to make one cheap
point.

Whatever one's own opinions on the matter, the truth of it all (even
if that were possible to discern in such a complex subject) were
completely lost in a 6-minute pseudo-scientific rant by Neil, all
courtesy of his notes.

And did I detect a snort of derision from the Hirst offstage when, in
the last 2 secs of the clip, Neil said he's like to ask him back on
the programme sometime? Or was he just wanting to pickle Neil in
formalin ............. no, hang on, that's a different
Hirst ............ isn't it?


Did Neil, A in fact perhaps start out with the intention of being a
barrister, and if so, what happened? Charmless character, isn't he?



--
Peter Thomas