On Feb 4, 6:16*pm, Brian Wakem wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:49*pm, Natsman wrote:

Not a rant, comrade, just telling it like it is.

And just for good measure I note with interest, and I confess, a
degree of satisfaction, that India are pulling out of the IPCC. *Could
this be the thin end of the wedge, I wonder? *Who knows...

CK

Present some evidence that temperatures are decreasing then

The tree ring data from Siberia that the CRU have shows temperatures
decreasing since the 60s. *Or rather it did before they decided to 'hide
the decline'.

I don't believe for one minute that the temperature is lower now than in the
60s but how do we know which figures to believe? *Which ones are real and
which are being massaged?

There's too many £trillions betting on run away global warming now so the
figures will show it happening regardless...

--
Brian Wakem

If Hadley have "hidden the decline" Brian, then so have GISS, NASA,
RSS and UAH, as all these series corroborate the fact that
temperatures have risen - and the latter global temperature data
source is run by a GW sceptic, Roy Spencer. Would he really have
become embroiled in this enormous conspiracy? As a result, the only
conclusion that can be drawn is that the 5 temperature series *are* to
be believed - or one high profile sceptic must have been lying along
with all the other scientists involved in the compilation of the
global temperature series. The conspiracy theory that the temperature
series have been massaged just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.