View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 14th 10, 11:33 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
Bernard Burton Bernard Burton is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2004
Posts: 5,382
Default Presumably there is a warm lower layer of air currently despite low 850 hPa's

Dave. I agree that the model has temp of -10 over the Dover Strait and Kent
yesterday afternoon, and surface temperatures there were Langdon Bay 2C and
Greenwich LV 2C, over a sea temp of 7C. The nearest ascent we have is the
midnight for Herstmonceux, which has a -9.9C at 850, and a 1000 mbar temp of
0.0, equating to a max sea level temp of 2C at 1025 mbar. If the boundary
layer between the surface and 850 mbar were dry, the maximum temperature
difference between the surface and 850 mbar would be appx 14C. However, that
layer is not dry, and from cloud base at about 300m (Herstmonceux at 00z) up
to the inversion base at 850 mbar, the air is mostly saturated, with the
corresponding saturated temp lapse rate. For a saturated lapse rate from 850
mbar to the surface, and -10C at 850 mbar, the surface temp would be appx
+0.5 at 1025 mbar. So for an 850 mbar temp of -10, the msl temp would be
limited to the range +0.5 to +4, in the absence of other factors. I am not
sure what part of Essex you are in, but Stansted yesterday reported temps
generally in the range +1 to +2. They are 100m ASL, so you could add another
1C if you are at sea level. It is also possible, and you do not say how your
temp is measured, that your 4.6C is influenced by something local, like
buildings. Also, are you sure of the calibration of your instrument. Lastly,
short-wave radiation can be significant, even on overcast days, and the
satellite imagery for 13th showed considerable breaks in the cloud over the
SE. When the ground is heated by radiation, the boundary layer temperature
profile becomes out of balance, and over a shallow layer near the ground can
exceed the dry lapse rate. Balance is only approached by convective mixing,
which redistributes the surface heating over the entire boundary layer.

http://www.woksat.info/etcsb13/sb13-1330-b-uk.html

And a PS. The base of the capping inversion is at 850 mbar at Herstmonceux.
Slight changes in this height can result in large changes in 850 mbar temp.
Also, if there is cloud up to the capping inversion, long-wave radiation
from its top can produce the same sort of inbalance as heating from the
ground does, depressing the temperature at the inversion base so that the
lapse rate in the upper portion of the cloud exceeds the saturated rate.
Again, convective mixing tries to restore the balance, and the cooling is
redistributed over the entire boundary layer.

--
Bernard Burton
Wokingham, Berkshire, UK.

Weather satellite images at:
www.woksat.info/wwp.html

"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...

"Bernard Burton" wrote in message
...
Could it be, Dave, that the model data you quote is incorrect? The

midday
ascents show 850 mbar temperature in the range -7 (Albermarle) to -9 (De
Bilt). The closest to your model value was Paris (-10), but the surface
temp
there is -3.
Another thing, if the lapse rate is equal to the dry adiabat, it

indicates
a
well mixed layer, not the opposite. You can not have a shallow surface
layer
warmed by the underlying sea, with colder air above, and also have an
unmixed layer at the surface. When cold air overlies a warm sea, there

is
a
flux of heat from the sea to the atmosphere, and this will lead to a

well
mixed boundary layer up to where ever the capping inversion is. In

today's
instance, using the ascent for Nottingham at midday, there is a dry

lapse
rate up to about 950 mbar, then a saturated lapse up to a capping
inversion
at 800 mbar, T= -10. The layer surface to 800 mbar presents a well mixed
layer with convection up to 800 mbar.
The GFS vertical charts for Europe (1800z) do not show 850 mbar temps
anywhere near -11 between 49N and 69N on the Greenwich meridian.
http://www.wetter3.de/vertikal.html

Watch for the line wrap!

http://weather.uwyo.edu/cgi-bin/soun...F%3ASKEWT&YEAR
=2010&MONTH=02&FROM=1312&TO=1312&STNM=03354


-----------------------

Thanks for the info Bernard - but am I mis-reading these two charts then?
One is the GFS ensemble 850 hPa data for London and the other the GFS

hi-res
850 hPa chart at 18z showing -10C and the earlier cold pool having passed
through earlier in the afternoon to the continent. This cold pool
corresponding to my 4C temp at 2pm. I'm clearly a bit confused!
http://www.wzkarten3.de/pics/MT8_London_ens.png
http://www.wzkarten3.de/pics/Rmgfs002.gif

Cheers,
Dave