It must be very irritating to some when Joe comes up with the right
analysise of global temperature trends months before they happen.
Looking back through his blogs the one of Sept 30th is pretty
outstanding,made at a time when most other predictions were stating the
opposite .
Yes his style is very 'non European',but at least he sticks his neck out and
tries to encourage debate other than the certainty of unargueable GW. I like
that !
Sorry if this naive summary upsets the scientists among us ,but when you
have been observing the weather for as long as me it's amazing how many
times the computers are confounded ,dare I mention the last few weeks ?.
On this side of the pond our local Guru Will takes chances ,this week for
example. but who doesn't enjoy the debate created by his efforts ?
So Joe and Will ,more power to your respective elbows ,I love reading your
stuff and defend your right to 'keep it coming' !

RonB
,
"Graham P Davis" wrote in message
...
On Monday 15 Feb 2010 23:26, Lawrence Jenkins scribbled:


"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...
http://www.accuweather.com/video-on-
demand.asp?video=66605873001&channel=VBLOG_******* I&title=The



I liked what Joe said.

"Do you believe that the contribution from human beings which is
equivalent
to the width of a hair on a one kilometer bridge a year, of a trace gas
essential for the maintenance of life on the planet, is worth more to the
global temperature then the influence of the sun, the ocean and volcanic
activity?"

If he's not worried about the effects of traces of a gas, how about he
goes
into a chamber with a similar trace of hydrogen cyanide in the air to
prove
his point?

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy
"I wear the cheese. It does not wear me."