On 19 Feb, 17:01, Peter Muehlbauer
wrote:
matt_sykes wrote:
On 17 fév, 15:32, JohnM wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:46*pm, Maggsy wrote:

On Feb 17, 11:42*am, matt_sykes wrote:

On 16 Feb, 22:33, Roger Coppock wrote:

Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2

The global data given above are graphed he

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The regression statistics for the line in the graph above
are below.

Coefficients:
* * * * * * *Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -25.75364 * *2.06182 * -12.5 * 2e-16
YEARMON * * * 0.01295 * *0.00103 * *12.5 * 2.8e-30

Residual standard error: 0.18 on 372 degrees of freedom
R-Squared: 0.30
F-statistic: *157 on 1 and 372 DF, *p-value: 2.82e-30

You are being lied to Roger. *The data can not be trusted.

Prove it?

Why should he? To Matt, this is as obvious as the fact that the earth
is flat. Or that oncologists tell patients they have cancer in order
to boost the sales of chemotherapeutic drugs.- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -

- Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

Why do GISS and NCDC use 80 % less weather stations today than in the
1980s?

You mean those correct measuring rural ones for sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep, of course. Never theones near air ports and heat exchangers,
incinerators, diesel generators etc etc etc.