In article ,
Alex Stephens Jr writes:
"John Hall" wrote in message
.. .

Forecasting weather and forecasting climate are two very different
things. It may be well be easier to forecast the climate for the next
few decades than it is to forecast the weather for the next three
months.

A very interesting point John, though I'm not sure your statement is
correct.
How successful have previous climate forecasts been in the past?

I don't think that scientists have been making them for more than a
couple of decades - at least not using sophisticated computer models. So
I think it is probably still too early to say.

And at what stage does a weather forecast become a climate forecast?
Alex.



I think the distinction lies in what degree of temporal resolution the
forecast attempts. So if it tries to forecast day by day - or even month
by month - changes, it's a weather forecast. But if it says something
along the lines of "in N years time we expect summers (or winters or
whatever) to be 2C warmer on average than they are now and rainfall to
be 10% less", then it's a climate forecast. A climate forecast says
nothing about any individual day or month or season or year, but only
about what the new average is likely to be like when compared with the
current average. (And possibly also what the new extremes are likely to
be like in relation to current ones; eg 10% of summers are expected to
have an average temperature of more than such and such a figure, when
currently 10% are warmer than some other value.)
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)