Thread: METAR question
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 26th 10, 12:11 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Martin Rowley Martin Rowley is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,750
Default METAR question

"Jim" wrote ...
In a typical METAR reading there can be more than one entry for the
cloud
conditions, ie: ... ... ... ... SCT025 BKN040 ... ... which would
indicate
scattered cloud at 2500ft + broken cloud at 4000ft (I think). My
question
is: is there a limit to how many cloud entries there can be?



.... yes: I was hoping someone with more up-to-date knowledge would
pitch in as I'm a bit rusty on the latest changes now, but what I've
written will give you a flavour of the instructions, and also give you
some idea of the difficulty of using METARs for the purpose intended.

The selection of the layers to be reported are as follows:-
1st group: the lowest layer of any amount.
2nd group: the next layer, which covers *more* than 2 oktas (i.e. SCT
or greater).
3rd group: the next higher layer covering more than 4 oktas (i.e. BKN
or greater).
Additional group to report CB or TCU if not already reported as above.
(Reg 15.9.1.4)

Order is from lowest to highest.

BUT .. and this is important for decoding/interpretation purposes ...
from Reg 15.9.1.1, " If there are no clouds below 1500m (5000ft) or
below the highest minimum sector altitude, whichever is greater, no
Cumulonimbus and no restriction on vertical visibility and the
abbreviations CAVOK and SKC are not appropriate, then the abbreviation
NSC shall be used."

Now, there have been changes to this: for example, 'SKC', sky clear,
is *not* to be used [though I still keep seeing it] and I believe (but
can't find the reference) that *any* CB (and possibly TCU)
irrespective of cloud base should be reported ... my old page for the
FAQ is still on my web site ....

http://booty.org.uk/booty.weather/me...TAR_decode.htm

but the relevant data should also be in the FAQ he-

http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/node/197

.... and *military* airfields in the UK at least *will* include cloud
layers above 5000ft & may have different rules to suit the RAF
operations.

.... however, to return to what I interpret as being your original
intention, using METAR reports to infer the 'state of the sky' is now
more or less impossible.

When I started coding such, we put cloud layers etc., in according to
the SYNOP rules, thus 3CU20, 5SC56, 8CI75 etc. That was changed to the
'FL' style of notation (thus 3CU020, 5SC060, 8CI250), then the 'oktas'
bit was smudged out and non-significant types omitted (SCT020, SCT060,
OVC250), and this quickly got overtaken by the 'nothing at/above
5000ft rule', so that only the first cloud group was reported in my
example, and even then if the VIS was above 9 km, CAVOK would be used
etc., etc.

If your intention is to use METARs to describe the state of sky ... it
can't be done! You can never be sure that all the cloud data is there
to accurately decide whether the sky is genuinely clear, or simply
that there is no significant cloud below 5000ft.


Martin.

--
Martin Rowley
West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl
Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W
NGR: SU 082 023