On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:51:01 -0500, josephus wrote:

Marvin the Martian wrote:

The e-mails shows how:
1) The "Climate Scientist" conspired and used "peer review" to prevent
opposing views that exposed their lies from being published. 2) How
they conspired to use "tricks" to "hide the decline". 3) How they
fudged the data.
4) The list goes on.

Really, flat out telling bald faced lies is really ugly. I can't
believe you're so damned stupid as to really believe your own lies. If
you can't address the facts, don't act like a mindless idiot who
repeats whatever he is told by his masters.


except the programs dont show that.

snip excuse for lying and outright fraud

A bald faced lie. It is pretty stupid of you to try and pass it off as
"dealing with the data". Idiot. How damned stupid ARE you anyway that you
thought someone would be so stupid as to believe you?

Best I can figure, you're an Anti-AGW crusader pretending to be an AGWer
in order to make them appear to be shameless, bald faced liars and
idiots. No one could be so stupid as to lie like you did and still be
able to work a keyboard.

It said right there in the code "fudge factor" and the numbers were
thrown in for NO REASON other than to produce a false increase in the
temperature.

If you're for real, then damn, there is something wrong with you and
people like you. Just wacko.