On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:56:58 -0500, josephus wrote:

Marvin the Martian wrote:

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:09:32 -0700, Rob Dekker wrote:


"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message


snip Mr. Dekker's claim that he is utterly ignorant of recent events,
much less science.

That's what your spin-masters they teach you to do in denial-school ?
Accuse others of what you commit yourself ?


I believe your claims that you're utterly and completely ignorant, Mr.
Dekker. I feel sorry for you. That was... pathetic.

Even more sadly for you, appeal to ignorance is still a fallacy. ;-D

idiot. where is your theory, where is your data. adhomin attacks are
not either data , evidece or theory.

First of all, the accusation I made was that Mr. Dekker was utterly
ignorant of recent events. Unlike you, who told a bald faced laughably
stupid idiotic lie about it.

Secondly, the subject has turned to "head up the ass denial" in the CRU e-
mails. You're and your ilk pray on the stupidity of ignorant people;
anyone who has read the e-mails know how boldly you lie.

Lastly, I was pointing out how stupid Mr. Dekker's argument in support of
the bad arguments (ad hom, post hoc, straw men and so on) being made.

It is not for me to produce a theory, evidence or data, (though Svensmark
has done so) to disprove AGW. It is up to the AGW advocates to prove it;
even the shill frauds at the IPCC don't claim they can prove it, so
listing to the "true believers" who think it is a scientific fact just
shows that they have their heads up Al Gore's ass.