On 19 Apr, 15:52, "James" wrote:
"Giga2" wrote in message





On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote:

On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote:

On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote:

On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric
Gisin" wrote in message



The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement
outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize
a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll
invade usenet.

I think they are here already.

Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this
NG for
ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months
though.

Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread.

I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who
have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence
of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend
and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose
some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got
to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen.

What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and
praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of
seeing how insane that is?

He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the
vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly
when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking
one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all
this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering
according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are
several flavors of players in the enviro con game.

Its worth remembering how many different warped motivations are behind
AGW fundamentalism.