"josephus" wrote in message
m
James wrote:

"Dawlish" wrote in message


On Apr 19, 3:52 pm, "James" wrote:

"Giga2" wrote in message







On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote:

On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote:


On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote:


On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote:


On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric
Gisin" wrote in message





The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement
outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution:
organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when
they'll invade usenet.


I think they are here already.


Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on
this NG for
ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months
though.


Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other
thread.


I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists
who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming
evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more
general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had
started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide
quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists
got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to
happen.


What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and
praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are
capable of seeing how insane that is?


He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely
the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin
endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes
out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones
dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't
worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or
two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con
game.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Ah, the political conspiracy theory raises it's ugly but strangely-
difficult-to-quantify-or provide-evidence-for head.


It's hard to believe you are that stupid.


I don't see you debunking any theory James by finding these "holes"?
Neither do I see you producing evidence of "corruption" James?


The evidence has been everywhere whether I produced it or not. The
fact that you don't want to know about it is typical for any troll
or liar who comes to the group and feigns surprise at things he says
he knows all about and proceeds to set them all straight. You really
aren't very good at this.


I do see you hugely upset about the world. It's a nice place really.



put up your cherry picked lies. I will seach and find the emails they
come out of. it is true they were ass holes but EVERYBODY in email
turns into one sooner or later. but it does not mean anybody is doing
anything the deniers are LYING about. the horrible truth is 3
different groups exhonerated the workers. it means the deniers
FAILED big time.

josephus

Cherry picked? These are obvious patterns of deception and for you and
the mutual admiration society of investigators to barely smack them on
the wrist like toddlers shows your and their own dishonesty to have your
way like any spoiled brat. The level of immaturity from you adolecent
minded saviors is astounding.