"Androcles" wrote in message
...

"Surfer" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:30:06 -0700, "Eric Gisin"
wrote:

http://www.thegwpf.org/climategate/8...-alarmism.html

Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:35 Richard S Lindzen

In mid-November of 2009 there appeared a file on the Internet containing
thousands of emails and
other documents from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East
Anglia in Great Britain.
How this file got into the public domain is still uncertain, but the
emails, whose authenticity is
no longer in question, provided a view into the world of climate research
that was revealing and
even startling.

In what has come to be known as "climategate," one could see unambiguous
evidence of the unethical
suppression of information and opposing viewpoints, and even data
manipulation.

Its not clear to me how serious those claims are.

However, evidence for global warming is also available from other
sources.

Evidence for chocolate eggs is also available from other sources. The
question is, did the Easter Bunny lay them?

Its not clear to me how serious your claims are.


As opposed to speculations about the Easter Bunny done by Androcles, Surfer
posted statements and graphs from scientific institions (at least most of
them).

If you want to argue with NASA or GISS or NOAA or CRU on a scientific basis,
then please go ahead.
But if you only argue on the basis of what you read on a denier blog site
about what they think they read in some private emails then please STFU and
let our scientists do their work.

Rob