there is no overall sea-level rise (see an article
on 21stcenturysciencetech.com). the melting
of land-ice is quite small, because a)
most glaciers are *not* receding, and b)
almost all of it is in Antarctica, which is not melting
(true, icebergs calve, there .-)

thus:
I just want to know,
why he attributes Leibniz's *vis viva* to Coriolis. now,
the Coriolis effect is interesting, because
it can also be a force, "depending."

thus:
his problem is not "research on the net;"
it appears that English is not his primary language,
so that we really can't say, what he is trying
to say. if you have ever tried to "deal"
with AP, you know of what I type.

the only possible cure -- other than
cruising on fora in his mother tongue, but
of which (like AP) he may not be literate --
is to *try* to read Shakespeare (and
this applies to everyone, who thinks he is or
ought to be literate in the "King's English,"
as proven in the KJV .-)

thus:
I missed that on the initial scan; it is to laugh!... but
I was interested to read of Soros' funding --
what a creep "philanthropist," he is (you can
check this on the LaRouchiac site .-)

so, basically, all Hindu gods should be toasted, if
y'know what I mean (althoug, of course,
each is very useful in its own domain, I'm sure,
other than "what is the speed of the propogation
of light?")

Light: A History!
http://wlym.com