On May 3, 3:05Â*pm, Meteorologist wrote:
On May 2, 5:06Â*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On May 2, 8:11Â*pm, Meteorologist wrote:

Dawlish's explanation of flaws in
Lindzen and Choi's work

http://groups.google.com/group/talk....1ffc74113?hl=e...

-----

Relationships between tropical sea surface
temperature and top�of�atmosphere radiation

Kevin E. Trenberth, John T. Fasullo,
Chris O’Dell, and Takmeng Wong

http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Staff/Fa...010etalGRL.pdf

-----

On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data
by RS Lindzen, YS Choihttp://www.drroyspencer.com/Lindzen-and-Choi-GRL-2009.pdf

-----

I will comment more later...

I ask for reaction from uk.sci.weather and
plenty of it...

-----

David Christainsen

I'll look forward to your comments, Crunchy.

You know that the proof is in the pudding.
Yet, you must immediately change your
usenet manners and stop your irritating tactics.

IOW focus only on the climate science. Â*You
would do this out of burning curiosity. Â*I have
burning curiosity. Â*Do you?

See if you can come up
with anything to defend Lindzen and Choi.

I already know Lindzen's attitudes very, very
well. Â*Remember - Lindzen lives in Newton, Mass
USA and so do I.

Do you really have both eyes open now?

Please be specific about his
use of only 40% of the earth's surface in his 2009 paper, won't you?

Yes.

And his cherry picking of time periods from *within* the last 30
years' data, won't you?

IMHO it is an issue HOW bad their cherry picking is,
such as it is.

And do talk about Kirchoff's law and his
flagrant disregard for it and its corollory that emissivity is equal
in all directions, won't you?

With relish.

If I were you I'd comment now, as this
is a meteorology newsgroup, with a few people who have an interest in
climatology and only a few with an interest in physics.

But, you are NOT me.

So, it will be later when I am good and ready;
not now. Â*Sorry.

All have an
interest in meteorology, however and that's a subject you very seldom
seem to mention, "Meteorologist".

I don't have to mention "it"; "it" is a given. Â*Wake up.
You were always out of touch with reality yours truly.

David Christainsen- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, there's a start, Lindzen lives in the same state. More? I'm
happy to wait until you are "good and ready".