On May 3, 3:20*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On May 3, 6:34*pm, Meteorologist wrote:





On May 3, 1:06*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On May 3, 3:05*pm, Meteorologist wrote:
...

Well, there's a start, Lindzen lives in the same state. More? I'm
happy to wait until you are "good and ready".

Prof. Lindzen lives in the same city and state
as I. *We were acquainted with one another thru
the MIT connection.

I say Prof. Lindzen is a big deal for climate science.

Moreover, I look forward to a real conversation with
you about climate science at long last.

Until then be well,
David Christainsen

You mean you say you went there and Lindzen is Sloan Professor of
Meteorology there.

You never went to MIT and you don't know
what I mean when I say Prof. Lindzen and
I were once acquainted with one another.
(I was not a MIT student at that time.)

Nice connection.

You don't know the connection because I withheld
the details.

Gustav Holst went to my old
university and I think he's a musical genius and a "big deal" in
music.

When you've got time in your busy schedule, do enlighten us about
Linzen's 2009 paper, written in collaboration with Yong-Sang Choi.

That's right; my schedule is busy; I am writing
a book with an ordained Christian minister. I
myself am a non-mainstream Christian minister.
Moreover, I have had a connection with sci.arch
since 2002. My daughter worked on an archaeological
dig once upon a time. So, I have unfinished business
with sci.archers, which also keeps me busy -

a) Tom McDonald
b) Eric Stevens
c) Peter Alaca
d) Ross Clark

Bottom line - Lindzen and Choi's work

I expect a conversation about it with
usenetters. You have led me to expect
only a few on uk.sci.weather are interested.
BTW I never said I was defending their work;
you said that. So, the operative words are -

a) climate science
b) conversation
c) burning curiosity

NOT -

a) polemics
b) irritating tactics
c) boorish manners

So, I recommend you keep an open mind
when our conversation gets going...

Best,
David Christainsen