On Jun 1, 6:34Â*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Jun 1, 3:30Â*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
Please see:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture09043.html
Â*"Accounting for multiple sources of uncertainty, a composite of
several OHCA curves using different XBT bias corrections still yields
a statistically significant linear warming trend for 1993–2008 of 0.64
W m-2 (calculated for the Earth’s entire surface area), with a 90-per-
cent confidence interval of 0.53–0.75 W m-2."
Ø Totally irrelevant
You need real data, which you do not have
— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes.