View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old June 1st 10, 05:28 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.geo.oceanography
Last Post Last Post is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2009
Posts: 185
Default NATU Robust warming of the global upper ocean

On Jun 1, 9:42*am, JohnM wrote:
On Jun 1, 2:56*pm, "Falcon" wrote:

"Roger Coppock" wrote in message


...


Please see:


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture09043.html


We did, ten days ago. Is there nothing new with which you can wind up the
opposition?


Ten days ago, eh? So what kept you from immediately reporting it on


Ø I didn't post it because it is pure nonsense and
not worth the bandwidth. The oceans will
continue to warm as the earth cools toward
reglaciation. Vide:

In 1979, Genevieve Woillard, a climate
paleologist in France, concluded from detailed
studies that the shift from a warm, interglacial
climate to ice age conditions at the beginning
of the last ice age, some 100,000 years ago,
took "less than 20 years". Her observations of
the decline of European forests led her to
conclude we may be in a similar period of
rapid climatic change.

Research has shown that this 20-year period is
one in which Mother Nature wreaks havoc on
humanity.

If the unchallenged results of the work of
Woillard and others who studied past ice ages
are any indication of the pace of glaciation,
once it starts, the transition period is a mere
20 years or so. And we may be well into that
20-year period now.

Woillard estimated that the period before that
final 20 years — when the earth began gearing
up for an end to the interglacial period —
could be as long as 150 years and as short as
75 years."

According to Woillard's studies and those of
other paleological climate researchers, the
transition between interglacial and glacial
periods is one of increasing violence — more
volcanic eruptions, storms, earthquakes, and
other natural disasters.

Ø Wake up John Morgan, et al.

——*——
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.

1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.

2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes
against their religious belief, they will cling to
that belief even if it means their death.

3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a
million years. There is no way to convince

the anthropogenic_global_warming_alarmists,

the terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and

predators to change their evil ways, They
knew what they were doing was wrong, but
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil deeds.