"Claudius Denk" wrote in message
...
On Jun 11, 6:48 am, "Eric Gisin" wrote:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...5570198/spiked


If you write something, as I have done with Chill, which is a rational,
critical appraisal of
the whole situation, you would at least expect to have some dialogue. But
there has been nothing. I
haven't had a single invitation to speak to any of these groups. Even
universities have been
reticent. I have been invited to speak at Leeds University, which has
quite a strong climate
community, and the Energy Institute. But the environmental community has
been absolutely silent
towards me. I would challenge them to bring all of their experts to the
table and hammer it out.

We're seeing the dangerous development here of a very intolerant political
ideology. It is a
very strange political and scientific situation, in which vast sums of
money are underwriting a
bureaucracy of climate accountants and auditors, and in which academic
funding is easier to obtain
if you put man-made climate change at the top of your research proposal. I
have never seen anything
like it in the 40 years of my scientific and environmental career.

Peter Taylor was talking to Tim Black.

Peter Taylor is author of Chill: A Reassessment of Global Warming Theory.
(Buy this book from
Amazon(UK).)

It was established some time ago that the thing AGW advocates fear
most is conceptual clarity.

------------------
Noisy people fear being ignored.