On Jul 13, 1:18*am, Joe Egginton wrote:
On 11/07/2010 22:14, Dawlish wrote:





On Jul 11, 7:37 pm, Adam *wrote:
On 09/07/2010 20:59, Dawlish wrote:

Because of the heat, some in the SE will *die* tonight, who wouldn't
have done, had it been cooler;

snip

Here you go:

http://tinyurl.com/356qwk6

I know. It's just sad when someone just can't see that and tries to
perpetuate their agenda-ridden health and safety polemic when some
people won't have survived the night. Such selfishness and lack of
concern for others is just inexcusable.

Not really, life is all about risk. *Is it worth putting out heat
warnings frightening people, when literally one or two may die? There’s
always been a risk of vulnerable people dying in excessive heat or cold.
* It is common knowledge and inherent in humans that vulnerable people
should be looked after in excessive heat or cold. *The population don’t
need to be told by governmental agencies how to look after vulnerable
people. * It's a sense of proportion that has gone out of the window
with the NHS and UKMO. *The same lack of proportion from governmental
agencies induces fear and paranoia into the UK population.

--
Joe Egginton
Wolverhampton
175m asl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think the idea about "common knowledge" is destroyed in Liz's post
Joe. Go back and read it again. The number and way that older people
died in that canicule was a national embarrassment to France and it
has changed the way that the French react to such forecast heat - and
rightly so. I'm afraid the population really does need to be told how
to look after vulnerable people and the authorities need to put these
plans into place. To do so, they need the first rate advice from the
Met Office. The heat this weekend was very well forecast and the lack
of reported problems is very probably testament to the way the health
service reacted to the excellent advice given to them.