On Sep 6, 6:49*am, Mike McMillan wrote:
On Sep 5, 10:09*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Mike McMillan" wrote in message

...

"In the spirit of transparency, I was wrong about global temp dropping
in August

The global temp DID NOT FALL in August as I had predicted it too.
Whether this a delay of my idea, or denial will be settled in the
spring. In the meantime the .51 was slightly cooler than the .52 in
August of 1998 and means this year still trails the warmest satellite
year on record, 1998"

http://www.accuweather.com/ukie/bast...urope-blog.asp

The near surface temperatures at the moment are higher than 1998

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem....csh?amsutemps

I saw that Mike and Joe had the grace to own up; however we are talking
about the timing of the cooling process. Its amazing though that there seems
to be no explanation for this shot of heat after 2008. I suppose the AGW's
could argue it's an accumulative build up of latent energy *in the world
storage tanks -the oceans.

By the way how are your accumulators *and photovoltaic panels ; *the thought
of all that excess energy in the summer months and you hoovering frantically
not to waste it does make me smile.

oops, started something there. It was only supposed to be tongue in
cheek, I was surprised he admitted
to being slightly out so early in his prediction.
Great summer for power, although I have been away for a good part of
it, working in the Med. I am considering
upgrading and applying for a "stand alone" FITS payments. Apparently
possible!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

For climate deniers, the cooling is always going to happen in the
future. We have had a period of record temperatures over the last 16
months and they are not yet falling despite strong negative forcings.
Combining the two satellite measures show August to have been a record
month for global temperatures and the obvious question any sceptic
must ask themselves is "why is it so warm". A denier like Natsman
won't even bother asking the question, as it simply cannot be CO2 to a
climate denier, but I suspect that Lawrence may actually be a sceptic
as he has asked the question, to his credit.

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem...?amsutemps+001

Just as a rider to that link. Is anyone able to explain why the trace
for August stayed below 2009's temperatures all month, yet the UAH
series places August warmer than August 2009? That's been puzzling me.
I can only think that either the daily trace is a good indication,
rather than an accurate measure, or that the trace measures the
temperature at a slightly different height from the final measure, or
that the trace measures a different area of the surface. I think
Graham(? Sorry if it's someone else!) has commented on this last
possible reason and he may well be correct.

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/uahncdc.lt