"Natsman" wrote in message
...
On Dec 30, 8:55 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message

b.com...

Interesting I'll need to watch it several times.

http://www.accuweather.com/video/732...lobe-will-(is)...

Sorry Kinetic how pathetec.

"Pathetec", Lawrence - was that a Freudian slip?

Anyway, Joe B's got my vote. What an honest, straightforward bloke.
Most of what he says is inordinately sensible, and hey, we can go
check for ourselves, which is more than we're encouraged to do by the
warmy-types. Maybe that's because they know they're on dodgy
ground...

CK

No I was replicating my first mistake with a second for hopefully the humour
angle -didn't work.

Now back to Joe.

I really can't understand the hostility shown towards him, if there is any
high profile people out there that have made such bold statements and seem
to be vindicated yet flying in face of the AGW self hating band wagon then
point them out.

Hold on there was such a person, a man who actually is a climate scientist
and not a jumped up pantry boy like Joe B who gets paid regardless of
whether his forecasts are wrong. No this man has to prove his theories
before a public penny changes hands. Its a scandle that no one here has ever
mentioned him. Who do I mean?

I mean of course who said in 2000 in an interview with the Independent
http://www.independent.co.uk/environ...st-724017.html

here's one of his quotes

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said this has he
cried all over his tax payer funded handsome pay slip
within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting
event".

and then Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic
research unit(CRU) said

"within a few years winter snowfall will become a very rare and exciting
event".

Hmmm unlike Joe who gets paid regardless Dr Viner must give back all the
grant money for getting it so wrong.