On Feb 15, 8:46*pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
I'm not familiar with NetWeather and I do not think there is an archive on
TWO board. I may be wrong? Anybody know? I must admit I'd like to know the
dates when the forecasts were prepared to check the synoptic situations as
per Richard D's suggestion. I really do wonder why Dawlish is dodging this
potentially beneficial aspect (for science)? Under what pseudonym did
Dawlish post on TWO board and NetWeather, was it "SW Zephyr" or something?
How can one look if one is not a member of those boards?

Will
--

"Siberian Knight" wrote in message

...



and absolute crock of utter lies as usual.
wont answer the question or provide evidence.
WHERE do we find them. Please post proof.
WHO determined they where wrong or right and to come up with those stats?
(no doubt yourself!)

its not forecasting. Its selective betting to make your self look good.
If your forecasted every day, not when it suits you or looks zonaly easy
some on here might give you the time of day.

Instead youve been exposed.

Damned LIES

On 15/02/2011 7:00 AM, Dawlish wrote:
xt -

I'll look forward to you judging it at outcome. Every one of these 99
forecasts has been published on Netweather, TWO and here. I can assure
you that they have been picked over when they've been wrong. It will
be good to recieve any comments on the hundredth.

If you feel it is easy PJ, to forecast at 10 days at any time, all I
ask is that you try it and see how easy it is. I'm sure you'll be
successful, if it is easy. Fair enough?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Pseudonyms" were SW Zephyr and the really crappy "cover up my
identity" one of Paul in Dawlish, Will. Every forecast was
interrogated and dissected, especially the 20-25% that ended up wrong,
right from the start in 2005. You may no longer be able to find them;
as I don't post there any longer, I'm afraid I don't know. I never
expected my experiment and forecasts to go on this long, when I
started 6 years ago and I don't know how long they archive those
posts, but I'm no liar and if you wish to accuse me of that, you'd
have to have clearer evidence than snipy little questions such as
this. You keep no records of your own weekly forecasts and their
accuracy, apart from ad hoc comments from walking friends and site
visitors, I believe? I actually have kept a running record and it is
completely kosher. Are you saying that it's made up and lies Will?
Every forecast on here (31 forecasts since 01/06/2009 - there may have
been some in 2008, but I have no record of those) has been open to
discussion and I return and discuss every one. You have never
discussed any of them and yet you now try to question my records.

Out of those 31 forecasts - all of which I'm happy to email to you -
26 have been correct and 5 incorrect. You can easily access them all
in the archive on here and see that.

You can happily question my methods and I'll happily defend them,
though it appears you would rather discuss in the 3rd person, which
makes discussion rather difficult, but *don't* question my honesty.
It's not in question.