Monday's Gale, well done Met O
On 14/09/2011 16:32, Norman wrote:
Martin Brown wrote:
On 14/09/2011 10:49, Ken Cook wrote:
The local man killed by a falling tree in Monday's gale was well known
to me. It certainly brings home another side of severe weather when
something like this happens. Was the Met Office right to issue gale
warnings? Ask ordinary folk here and you will be told in no uncertain
terms. They don't know what the official terms of a gale are and aren't
particularly interested, but they do know that a gale warning means
damage, strong winds and danger.
I agree. It is more important than ever now that there are lots of semi-dead
horse chestnut trees about with brittle branches. One of my neighbours had a
30' tree snap in two on Monday - narrowly missing their house. The mature
oaks I can see from home have survived unscathed despite being in a very
exposed position and swaying like crazy on the day (whole tree that is not
just the branches).
As I posted in another thread, my wife had a problem travelling from
Macclesfield to London by train on Monday as the line was closed for a while
due to a fallen tree. It doesn't bear thinking about what might happen if one
of the high speed Virgin trains ran into a fallen tree. There's not much the
train companies can do when they receive a gale warning, other than run the
trains much more slowly than usual, which they don't.
Actually, they do; and this was one of the causes of the delays which
occurred on the main lines that day. Depending on the risk, the
allowable speed might be reduced to as low as 50 mph. This is going to
cause big delays on long-distance routes with normal speeds of 100 - 125
mph. But, as you say, this is preferable to the alternative, especially
considering a collision at 100mph releases not twice but four times the
destructive energy of a collision at 50mph.
When my wife eventually
got a train on Monday it ran at the normal speed. I suppose the answer would be
to cut down all the trees bordering the railway lines but I can't see that ever
happening. Makes you think, though.
You're so right. Everyone loves trees these days but, like anything
else, trees in the wrong place can cause problems. But the fact that a
particular train ran at the normal speed over a certain section of route
doesn't mean that all the others that day did, or even that that
particular train was allowed to run at normal speed over all of its
route. The "emergency" speed limits will be reviewed as circumstances
change.
--
- Yokel -
Yokel posts via a spam-trap account which is not read.
|