On Oct 17, 8:41*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Oct 17, 6:01*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:





On Oct 17, 5:47*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Probably model fluff, but you can imagine the scurrying and
speculation amongst the coldies if these charts cropped up on 2 models
in January - even if it was for just one run on each!!

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm2402.gif

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn2401.png

Now who was it who said only recently.

"gfs model fluff at 12 days. Just shows how little you know about
trying to forecast at distance, using a single model run, I'm afraid.
*)) "

Oh yes it was you LOL

Talking out yer keyboard as usual. You really don't get the model
malarkey *business, do you?

That's why I call using one model run as any kind of predictive tool
"model fluff" and it is exactly what people like you do and what you
did only a week ago. I'd hope that would be a lesson for the winter,
but I doubt it will and we'll see the "EASTERLIES!!!!!!!!! *again,
this winter, after a single model run - even from MetO professionals
who like the cold, based on single model runs. *))

Don't you just love it when someone like Lawrence falls headlong into
the trap. laughing - that really is funny- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Too late to wriggle out now you are justreinforcing your ludicrous
behaviour I mean if what you're saying is true then that what make you
look very childish; either way your exposed a tad more a pompous
vainglorious twerp. The sort of man who wears out mirrors. the David
Hassledolt of ukSci blather

It also begs the questionl if you are so dismissive of one model run
why bleedin' mention iit then in the first place; covering all bases
are we?

In fact as natsman points out were are in for one heck of an La Nina,
but a cooling planet doesn't mean that our winter will be cold but the
odds are a hell of a lot better.