On Nov 7, 9:50*am, tim wrote:
I'm watching

http://earthquake-report.com/2011/09...y-islands-spai...

which might get interesting soon !

You watching this Bjørn?

(although there are some who reckon that the island will break into
two , fall in the sea and cause a tsunami that will swamp New York !)

That would decrease in potential according to the inverse square law.
Simple dynamics are not tidal in nature.

The Low over Svarlbad is 970mb, not the deep dartboard occasioning
this:

Yesterday I happened to discover what you wrote on my thread on the
945/935 mb
Low west of Norway just before Christmas...!
(That Low was the deepest in 2004 in Norwegian waters, as far as I
have been
able to find out. It was named 'Finn', by the way).
I subsequently checked all your Usenet postings the following days up
to now
on Google...

And I then discovered what has been going on in your mind concerning
your
theory and the earthquake(s) you expected from your theory/experience
and
from the perceived connections between these phenomena.
Then of course came THE EARTHQUAKE and THE TSUNAMI...!
The rest is, regrettably we must say, history.
If anyone read what you posted until late 25th (and I think very few
has done
that) they will see you were 'scaringly' close to predicting what
happened.

*******

....But then that was an ongoing whatchermacallit:
Ho hum, t'was ever thus:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levant_%28wind%29

Lake Effect = Levant?
Cause and effect = yes. Thus a relationship with them too, I propose.

*******

One for spike:
Do me a favour Brian, prove me wrong or failing that, I will accept a
Dawlish. (In for a tuppeny hapenny in for threehapence .~)

*******

How much is a a simple sunlight gauge?