On Dec 3, 10:57*pm, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article 3fc792f9-2255-43e0-85e9-5998bf8a5123
@g7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com, says...

*but don't be too
quick to cticise when someone offers the other side of the coin -
which may actually be the probability. I see nothing wrong with
presenting the probable, or calling the unlikely, unlikely

This is so NOT what /you/ are doing. You are criticising, attacking and
engaging in purile point scoring.

Go look at the first paragraph of your first post in this thread and
tell me where the 'other side of the coin' is.

sheesh

--
Alan LeHun
In a foul mood tonight. Sorry peeps.

Yes you are. Tomorrow will be better..........hopefully.

In the meantime, the cold "wodge" of air stays right were it is in the
forseeable future; over Greenland and shows no signs of being advected
towards us and is really not "flooding south to re-inforce the
Atlantic baroclinicity in the cold westerly". More likely (but a long
way from being certain) we could have WAA into the Arctic, taking a
path between Greenland and us and cutting off any possible cold feed.
But you like what Will says, so fair enough.

It will get cold and snow in lowland England, but not over the next 10
days, in most areas.

PS Don't shoot the messenger; he's only being highly sensible and
reading the charts as they should be read. With sense and reality.