On Feb 14, 7:29*pm, Tunderbar wrote:
On Feb 14, 12:17*pm, "Regnad Kcin" wrote:





"Speedbump" wrote in message

...
On Feb 13, 2:31 pm, Tunderbar wrote:

On Feb 13, 4:04 pm, enigma wrote:

Arctic warms to highest level yet as researchers fear tipping points

Jeremy Hance
mongabay.com

February 13, 2012

http://news.mongabay.com/2012/0213-h...ingpoints.html

oops....

http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/...&fd=10&fy=1979...

It's still there....

Hey ****er it is still winter you jackass. *Try looking at this in
september moron

Ok idiot. Just as soon as you explain why that makes a difference and
why a snap shot thirty years apart in February shows little or no ice
loss.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How many times do you have to make an idiot of yourself over this? A
snapshot of February ice in 2100 will not show an immense amount of
difference to 1979, never mind February 2012. February in the Arctic
is bloody cold. It was in 1979, it is now and it will be at the end of
this century. The sea will be frozen in February 2100, as it is frozen
now. It always been frozen in human history in February and it very
probably probably always will be. The fact that you don't understand
why that happens is a problem of yours; no-one else's.

September, however, is a very different time of year and there is
*highly likely* to be no ice in the Arctic in September 2100 and there
won't have been for at least 50 years. The reason will have been
global warming and the cause of that will, very probably, have been
anthropomorphic CO2.