On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:15:18 -0400, bjacoby
wrote:

On 4/25/2012 9:38 AM, Bill Snyder wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:35:38 +0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell
wrote:

But the dog ate the evidence of it.
...

Speaking of dogs...it seems there are a couple of puppies chewing on my
pants-leg.

Isn't this one of them "peel to auth-or-i-tay" things Ben likes to avoid
in case he comes out less than favorably?

You'd think that just by random chance a clueless person trying to
argue would stumble onto a non-fallacy once in a while; but it
never seems to happen. Almost makes you wonder if there's some
bias in the process somewhere.

Good one Snider! Well above your standard fare! Give some lessons to R.
Kym.

Meanwhile, you produce no evidence to back up the BS you were
spewing. What a surprise.


--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]